Meeting Charleston
Meeting Charleston
Details
- Organization: ASIS International: Charleston Chapter
- Date: 3/27/2021
- Topic: Change Management and Successful Strategies to Implement Change
Meeting Notes
- Change is hard to implement
- Change is necessary
- If the selected process/software is not broken, don’t change
- Successful change is based on employee morale, if the change is not effective, then morale will plummet
- There are many different models for implementing change
Example
As an example, let us consider Company X and Company Y who both allow their developers to use a text editor of choice on their Linux
machines when working on code such as:
nano
vim
sublime
notepad++
vscode
leafpad
micro
(Really cool and minimal cli text editor that has syntax higlighting which can be found here)pluma
IDEs
(for this example, Company X has built their product withpython3
)
As listed above, there are many different editors in place to edit the codebase. As a bad example of change management, Company X’s Lead Developer has recently heard about vscode
, has began to use it in their workflow, and wants to implement vscode
team wide. The Lead Developer wants to implement this overnight, with only their approval, and not give their team any time to adjust to the new product into their toolchain or ask for input from their team. This would be an example of a bad change management, since a sudden change would tank the morale of their team and inhibit productivity due to the new learning curve for the new environment. With this sudden change, team members would be more likely to revert back to their previous text editor
On the contrary, Company Y wants to implement the same change as Company X and unify their developers under one text editor to edit the codebase. Company Y’s Lead Developer holds a meeting with their team members and guages their opinions on the change and what the pros and cons of each text editor that is used by each of the developers. The Lead then takes that information and does their own research, and narrows their choices down to nano
and vscode
due to the minimal learning curve and they were the most popular. The Lead then re-polls their team and nano
wins. Once nano
wins, it can be installed on the team’s Linux
machines. This can be done easily, since Company Y has implemented ansible
across their machines and can deploy the necessary software with the following playbook:
---
name: install nano
become: true # become sudo to install nano
hosts: linux # all linux machines in the environment
tasks:
- name: update repositories
- apt:
update_cache: yes
- name: install nano
- apt:
name: nano
state: present
This was a very naive example, but once this scales to network components or even changing direction on a project, it is very important to make sure that the change can occur properly and minimize potential employee morale within the team.